Defendants Continue Efforts to Delay Court Proceedings and Hide Conduct from Public Scrutiny

On June 7, 2012, defendant Steve Hall filed a motion with the U.S. Bankruptcy Court, seeking an order that would discard the bulk of the evidence demonstrating his and the other defendants’ inequitable conduct. 

Ironically, the motion claims that defendants were “sandbagged” by new evidence that has been in play now for more than two years.  This motion comes after defendants filed a last-minute petition for bankruptcy on the eve of trial this past February 27 in an attempt to delay proceedings and a public airing of their conduct. 

Paley’s reply brief in support of the motion to dismiss the bankruptcy action provides a telling look behind the curtain of defendants’ conduct.  The brief–in particular pages 6 through 9–details defendants’ scheme to improperly convert Paley’s debt into equity, and then to sell off Radar Networks’ assets at firesale prices to a separate company controlled by defendant Hall.

The U.S. Court System is built on public access and exposure of all evidence.  Hall’s most recent motion demonstrates a continuing pattern of delay, coupled with attempts to keep evidence out of the public eye.  Despite defendants’ efforts, this case cannot be delayed indefinitely, and the true nature of defendants’ conduct will eventually be aired before the public.

Сподели:
Edno23 Favit Svejo Twitter Facebook Google Buzz Delicious Google Bookmarks Digg